[LACNIC/Politicas] Proposed Policy: 4-Byte AS Number Policy Proposal

Geoff Huston gih at apnic.net
Thu Dec 29 19:50:01 BRST 2005


[My apologies for the lack of a translation of this policy proposal into
Spanish. naturally I would appreciate it if a Spanish translation could
be provided here - thanks, Geoff]


1. Policy Proposal Name: 

        4-Byte AS Number Policy Proposal

2. Author:              

        Geoff Huston
        gih at apnic.net
        APNIC

3. Proposal Version:    

        1.0

4. Submission Date:     

        9 December 2005 (resubmitted on the 30th December)

5. Proposal Type:               

        New

6. Policy Term:         

        Temporary (1 January 2007 ­ 1 January 2010)

7. Policy Statement:

   This policy proposal nominates 3 dates for changes to the current AS
   Number allocation policy for the registry:
 
   1. On 1 January 2007 the registry will process applications that
      specifically request 32-bit only AS Numbers and allocate such AS
      Numbers as requested by the applicant. In the absence of any
      specific request for a 32-bit only AS Number, a 16-bit only AS
      Number will be allocated by the registry.
 
   2. On 1 January 2009 the registry will process applications that
      specifically request 16-bit only AS Numbers and allocate such AS
      Numbers as requested by the applicant. In the absence of any
      specific request for a 16-bit only AS Number, a 32-bit only AS
      Number will be allocated by the registry.
 
   3. On 1 January 2010 the registry will cease to make any distinction
      between 16-bit only AS Numbers and 32-bit only AS Numbers, and will
      operate AS number allocations from an undifferentiated 32-bit AS
      Number allocation pool.
 
   No other changes in AS number allocation policy are implied by this
   proposal.


8. Rationale:

   Recent studies of AS number consumption rates indicate that the
   existing pool of unallocated 16-bit AS Numbers will be exhausted
   sometime in the period between 2010 and 2016, absent of any concerted
   efforts of recovery of already-allocated AS Numbers [1] [2].
   Standardization work in the IETF has produced a document that is
   currently being submitted as a Proposed Standard that will expand the
   AS Number space to a 32-bit field [3].

   It is noted that some advance period may be required by network
   operators to undertake the appropriate procedures relating to support
   of 32-bit AS numbers, and while no flag day is required in the
   transition to the longer AS Number field, it is recognised that a
   prudent course of action is to allow for allocation of these extended
   AS numbers well in advance of an anticipated 16-bit AS Number
   exhaustion date.

   This policy proposal details a set of actions and associated dates for
   RIR AS Number allocation policies to assist in an orderly transition
   to use of the 32-bit AS Number space.

   The essential attributes of this policy proposal are to facilitate the
   ease of transitional arrangements by equipment vendors, network
   managers and network operations staff, to provide the industry with
   some predictability in terms of dates and associated actions with
   respect to registry operational procedures for AS Number allocations.

   Nomenclature

   It is proposed to identify 32-bit AS Numbers using a syntax of <high
   order 16 bit value in decimal>.<low order 16 bit value in decimal>.
   Accordingly, a 32-bit AS number of value 65546 (decimal) would be
   identified as “1.10”.

   Terminology

   “16-bit only AS Numbers” refers to AS numbers in the range 0 – 65535

   “32-bit only AS Numbers” refers to AS Numbers in the range 1.0 –
   65535:65535 (decimal range 65,536 - 4,294,967,295)

   “32-bit AS Numbers” refers to AS Numbers in the range 0.0 –
   65535.65535 (decimal range 0 – 4,294,967,295)

   References

   [1] Daily AS Number Report, http://www.potaroo.net/tools/asns
   [2] ASNs MIA: A Comparision of RIR Statistics and RIS Reality,
       http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0510/wilhelm.html
   [3] BGP Support for Four-octet AS Number Space, 
       draft-ietf-idr-as4bytes-12.txt



9. Timetable for implementation:

   Procedures to support this proposal need to be implemented by 1
   January 2007
        






More information about the Politicas mailing list