[LACNIC/Politicas] [lacnog] Fwd: APNIC Announces its IPv4 Address Pool Reaches Final /8

[Alejandro Acosta]

Christian,
  Otra consulta, ¿esta politica sería para todas las IP o solo el /8
final?. En base a esta respuesta tendría muchas otras inquietudes, por
ejemplo que aprueben una politica similar en otro RIR (disculpen si
existe y yo no la conozca) y pueda afectar a LATAM (ISPs, Enterprises,
etc) como región usuaria de Internet.
  Personalmente me agrada la politica solo para el /8 final.

Saludos,

Alejandro,


2011/4/15 Christian O'Flaherty <christian.oflaherty at gmail.com>:
> Deberíamos tener una oración bien simple entre las políticas que diga
> claramente que las direcciones IP que asigna Lacnic son para usarse en
> nuestra región.
> Enviaré una propuesta.
>
> Christian
>
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Nicolas Antoniello
> <nantoniello at gmail.com> wrote:
>> <chair hat = off>
>>
>> Todo es posible...
>>
>> Esa es una de las "alternativas" que en su momento algunos manejamos como
>> mecanismos que van en favor de una corrida de solicitud de direcciones IPv4
>> en nuestra región.
>> Además, el hecho de que en nuestra región no sea necesario disponer de
>> sistema autónomo (asignado por la propia LACNIC) para solicitar direcciones,
>> hasta podría facilitar (aunque solo sea un poco) esa alternativa.
>>
>> Con esto no digo que sea bueno exigir AS para solicitar direcciones IP...
>> sino que (en mi opinión) la ausencia podría simplificar la solicitud y el
>> uso de las direcciones.
>>
>> La pregunta podría formularse de esta manera:
>>
>> - Con las políticas actuales, que impide que alguien que NO tenga Sistema
>> Autónomo solicitado a LACNIC, haga un pedido de direcciones IP a LACNIC
>> (porque tiene una parte de la empresa radicada en la region de LACNIC) y
>> luego utilice esas direcciones publicándolas al mundo desde un AS de APNIC,
>> RIPE, ARIN o AFRINIC ???
>>
>> Saludos,
>> Nicolas
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:02, Christian O'Flaherty
>> <christian.oflaherty at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Es posible que comiencen a radicarse empresas Asiaticas en Latam como
>>> proveedores de servicio de Internet para conseguir direcciones IPv4 de
>>> Lacnic? En algunos paises de nuestra región es muy simple radicar una
>>> empresa para hacer eso.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo
>>> <carlosm3011 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > FYI
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> > From: Axel Pawlik <no-reply at ripe.net>
>>> > Date: Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 5:08 AM
>>> > Subject: APNIC Announces its IPv4 Address Pool Reaches Final /8
>>> > To: ncc-announce at ripe.net, ripe-list at ripe.net, ncc-services-wg at ripe.net
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > [Apologies for duplicate emails]
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Dear Colleagues,
>>> >
>>> > Today, Friday 15 April 2011, APNIC, the Regional Internet Registry
>>> > (RIR) for the Asia Pacific region, announced that it has distributed
>>> > the final IPv4 address space from its reserves of IPv4.
>>> >
>>> > This means that APNIC is now supplying IPv4 address space to its
>>> > members from the last /8 it holds according to the guidelines in
>>> > section 9.10 in "Policies for IPv4 address space management in the
>>> > Asia Pacific region":
>>> > http://www.apnic.net/policy/add-manage-policy
>>> >
>>> > This event does not affect the RIPE NCC's reserves of IPv4 address
>>> > space and we will continue to distribute these resources to our
>>> > members on the basis of need until we reach the last /8.
>>> >
>>> > According to RIPE Document ripe-509, section 5.6, once the RIPE NCC
>>> > reaches the last /8 of IPv4 address space, each Local Internet
>>> > Registry (LIR) can receive one /22 (1024 IPv4 addresses) upon
>>> > application for IPv4 resources. In order to obtain this /22
>>> > allocation, the LIR must already have an IPv6 allocation and have a
>>> > demonstrated need for address space.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > IPv6 - Act Now
>>> > ---------------
>>> >
>>> > The RIPE NCC cannot predict how long its own supply of IPv4 address
>>> > space will last and has worked for several years to inform all
>>> > stakeholders of the urgent need to deploy IPv6.
>>> >
>>> > It is now imperative that all stakeholders deploy IPv6 on their
>>> > networks to ensure the continuity of their online operations and the
>>> > long-term growth of the Internet.
>>> >
>>> > For more information on IPv6 and its deployment, advice from experts
>>> > and where to get training, please see:
>>> > www.ipv6actnow.org
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Further Information
>>> > --------------------
>>> >
>>> > For more information on IPv4 exhaustion, please see:
>>> > http://www.ripe.net/internet-coordination/ipv4-exhaustion
>>> >
>>> > For more information on how the RIPE NCC's last /8 will be
>>> > distributed, please see:
>>> > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-509
>>> >
>>> > For information about the amount of IPv4 address space left in the
>>> > RIPE NCC's available pool of IPv4, please see the graph online at:
>>> >
>>> > http://www.ripe.net/internet-coordination/ipv4-exhaustion/ipv4-available-pool-graph
>>> >
>>> > Regards,
>>> >
>>> > Axel Pawlik
>>> >
>>> > Managing Director
>>> > RIPE NCC
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > --
>>> > =========================
>>> > Carlos M. Martinez-Cagnazzo
>>> > http://www.labs.lacnic.net
>>> > =========================
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > LACNOG mailing list
>>> > LACNOG at lacnic.net
>>> > https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lacnog
>>> >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> LACNOG mailing list
>>> LACNOG at lacnic.net
>>> https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/lacnog
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Politicas mailing list
> Politicas at lacnic.net
> https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/politicas
>