[LACNIC/Politicas] Defining routing abuse

[Arturo Servin]

Wrong, RIPE and LACNIC are not equivalent.

They are very similar but these communities started and evolved
differently. There are many things that are the same but saying that are
the same are just wrong.

In that respect, in LACNIC there is only one WG, the addressing policy.
Whatever we discuss here and accept to go to the manual is binding to
LACNIC operation.

Other work groups are not binding and support community activities (ipv6,
security, etc.)

Regards
as

On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 1:09 PM JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via Politicas <
politicas at lacnic.net> wrote:

> Arturo,
>
> This is wrong, not going into the nits, but the main broken concept that
> you have about how RIPE works.
>
> In RIPE community (equivalent to LACNIC community), we deal with policies,
> in an equivalent way.
>
> The only difference is that in LACNIC the only "WG" for the PDP is this
> list.
>
> In RIPE, we distribute the "work-load" in different WGs, but ALL THEM use
> the SAME PDP, and all them DO policies, which are the SAME for all the RIPE
> community and that RIPE NCC applies (as equivalent to LACNIC association).
>
> Regards,
> Jordi
>
>
>
> El 12/4/19 14:04, "Politicas en nombre de Arturo Servin" <
> politicas-bounces at lacnic.net en nombre de arturo.servin at gmail.com>
> escribió:
>
>     Just to note.
>
>     RIPE =! LACNIC
>
>     RIPE NCC ~ LACNIC but not the same
>
>     The anti-abuse WG is a group in RIPE, not RIPE NCC.
>
>     So, in that respect a RIPE WG that deals with operational issues as the
>     routing or anti-abuse would be the right place to discuss this, But
> not the
>     address policy wg that is the equivalent of this list.
>
>     As you can see, the scope of LACNIC vs RIPE is different.
>
>     https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe
>
>
>     Regards
>     as
>
>     On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 12:16 PM Carlos Friaças via Politicas <
>     politicas at lacnic.net> wrote:
>
>     >
>     > FYI.
>     >
>     > This could also be an interesting read for those discussing
> LAC-2019-5
>     > (either supporting it or opposing it).
>     >
>     > Best Regards,
>     > Carlos
>     >
>     > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>     > Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 11:35:00
>     > From: Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera at gmail.com>
>     > To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net
>     > Cc: Carlos Friaças <cfriacas at fccn.pt>,
>     >      JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet at consulintel.es>
>     > Subject: Defining routing abuse
>     >
>     > Peace,
>     >
>     > This is to continue the discussion around 2019-03. Here's our today's
>     > article about the ways some operators do traffic engineering:
>     > https://radar.qrator.net/blog/new-hijack-attack-in-the-wild
>     >
>     > Should that also be treated as a policy violation? This is clearly
>     > intentional.
>     >
>     > --
>     > Töma
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > Politicas mailing list
>     > Politicas at lacnic.net
>     > https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/politicas
>     >
>     _______________________________________________
>     Politicas mailing list
>     Politicas at lacnic.net
>     https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/politicas
>
>
>
>
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.theipv6company.com
> The IPv6 Company
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of
> the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized
> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the
> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal
> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
> communication and delete it.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Politicas mailing list
> Politicas at lacnic.net
> https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/politicas
>