[LACNIC/Politicas] Nueva versión de la propuesta LAC-2020-1

Mon Apr 13 00:01:20 GMT+3 2020

Hola a todos

Algunas aclaraciones con respecto a esta nueva versión basadas en los 
comentarios de la discusión anterior, así como en el análisis de impacto 
realizado por el staff:

- Deja aún más claro que la política solo es válida para las 
organizaciones receptoras de transferencias en la región de LACNIC.
- Agrega el término "assignment" junto con "allocation" que faltaba.
- Además de considerar organizaciones que ya tienen el espacio de 
direcciones de LACNIC, también considera aquellas que eventualmente 
reciben asignaciones de su proveedor y que ya tienen IPv6 operativo, lo 
que permite probar y llevar a cabo la transferencia, convirtiéndose en 
miembros.
- Agrega otra excepción que dice que cuando LACNIC ya no pueda entregar 
asignaciones IPv4 debido al agotamiento de la reserva para nuevos 
participantes (punto 11.1 del manual de políticas), el solicitante podrá 
transferir hasta un máximo de a /22 sin la necesidad de demostrar que 
IPv6 está operativo, eliminando así esta barrera y manteniéndola en 
igualdad de condiciones para estos casos.

Me gustaría pedirles a todos aquellos que se han opuesto anteriormente 
que vuelven a leer la propuesta y evalúan que esta es solo oportunidad 
mas para traer un poco más de igualdad a este ecosistema y que no tiene 
la intención de resolver definitivamente el problema de adopción de 
IPv6, pero solo sumando esfuerzos para equilibrar mejor un problema 
creciente que inevitablemente tendremos que enfrentar de una forma u 
otra que es el agotamiento de IPv4.
De esta manera, le propongo que lo ayude a hacerlo con un poco más de 
anticipación, de lo contrario, la mayoría de estos problemas y 
conflictos terminarán aquí, en estos mismos foros.

Tenemos un problema real que es la desigualdad que se ha creado desde el 
momento en que alguien comienza a recibir recursos IPv4 no solo porque 
los justifiquen sino porque pueden pagar más. Esto con el tiempo impacta 
negativamente en todo el ecosistema de Internet en la región y en el 
mundo, incluso para aquellos que han hecho su parte para implementar 
IPv6 y asegúrese de que Internet continúe funcionando según lo esperado.

La decisión de no implementar IPv6 en una red perjudica a esa 
organización más que a las demás, pero cuando se trata de 
transferencias, el impacto negativo es en todos los demás y, por lo 
tanto, es bastante razonable solicitar *al menos* demostrar que IPv6 
está operativo para permitir continuar transfiriendo más IPv4.

Saludos cordiales a todos
Fernando Frediani

On 31/03/2020 16:51, info-politicas at lacnic.net wrote:
> [Português abaixo]
> [English below]
>
> Estimados suscriptores de la lista de políticas de LACNIC,
>
> La propuesta LAC-2020-1 ha pasado de la versión 1 a la versión 2
>
> Título: Agregar IPv6 operativo como requisito para las transferencias de IPv4
>
> Resumen: On 15th February 2017 LACNIC started IPv4 Exhaustion Phase 3 meaning only new entrants can receive up to a single /22 of IPv4 space. Since then the amount of IPv4 Transfers between organizations has increased reasonably as shown by the official LACNIC reports. With the implementation of LAC-2019-1 and possibility of Inter-RIR transfers these numbers have the potential to grow substantially.
>
> The objective of this proposal is to add as a requirement for organizations in process of receiving transferred IPv4 space under 2.3.2.18 to show they have an IPv6 allocation/assignment by LACNIC or a provider and that is operational on their networks. Such organization must be able to prove this IPv6 space is being used by providing LACNIC the documented network deployment details to prove IPv6 is operational in significant parts of the network.
>
> On 28th November 2019 LACNIC Board issued a statement (https://www.lacnic.net/4283/2/lacnic/lacnic-board-calls-on-the-community-to-promote-ipv6-deployment) reinforcing the issue about IPv4 exhaustion, mentioning IPv4 address space will be exhausted by mid-2020 and calling the community to promote IPv6 deployment.
> In its statement LACNIC Board “invite the community to work on promoting the development of policies that will accelerate the effective deployment of IPv6 above other policies that may be discussed at a later date.”
>
> In the case the receiver provides a written statement from its upstream that IPv6 connectivity is unavailable, the IPv6 requirement may be waived. In the case LACNIC is not able to meet a new entrant request for IPv4 space the IPv6 requirement may be waived for a transfer up to a /22.
>
> Para ver el detalle ingrese en:
> https://politicas.lacnic.net/politicas/detail/id/LAC-2020-1/language/sp
>
> Los cambios respecto a la versión anterior se pueden visualizar aquí:
> https://politicas.lacnic.net/politicas/diff2?id=LAC-2020-1&v=2&v2=1&language=SP
>
> Los comentarios y los puntos de vista aportados por la comunidad son vitales para el correcto desarrollo del proceso de la propuestas
> - ¿Apoya usted o se opone a esta nueva versión de la propuesta?
> - ¿Ve alguna desventaja en esta nueva versión de la propuesta?
> - ¿Qué cambios podrían hacerse a esta nueva versión de la propuesta para que sea más eficaz?
>
>
> Por más información contacte ainfo-politicas at lacnic.net
> Saludos cordiales,
> ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
> Prezados assinantes da lista de políticas de LACNIC,
>
> A proposta LAC-2020-1 tem passado da versão 1 para a versão 2
>
> Título: Adicionar IPv6 operacional como requisito para as transferências do IPv4
>
> Resumo: On 15th February 2017 LACNIC started IPv4 Exhaustion Phase 3 meaning only new entrants can receive up to a single /22 of IPv4 space. Since then the amount of IPv4 Transfers between organizations has increased reasonably as shown by the official LACNIC reports. With the implementation of LAC-2019-1 and possibility of Inter-RIR transfers these numbers have the potential to grow substantially.
>
> The objective of this proposal is to add as a requirement for organizations in process of receiving transferred IPv4 space under 2.3.2.18 to show they have an IPv6 allocation/assignment by LACNIC or a provider and that is operational on their networks. Such organization must be able to prove this IPv6 space is being used by providing LACNIC the documented network deployment details to prove IPv6 is operational in significant parts of the network.
>
> On 28th November 2019 LACNIC Board issued a statement (https://www.lacnic.net/4283/2/lacnic/lacnic-board-calls-on-the-community-to-promote-ipv6-deployment) reinforcing the issue about IPv4 exhaustion, mentioning IPv4 address space will be exhausted by mid-2020 and calling the community to promote IPv6 deployment.
> In its statement LACNIC Board “invite the community to work on promoting the development of policies that will accelerate the effective deployment of IPv6 above other policies that may be discussed at a later date.”
>
> In the case the receiver provides a written statement from its upstream that IPv6 connectivity is unavailable, the IPv6 requirement may be waived. In the case LACNIC is not able to meet a new entrant request for IPv4 space the IPv6 requirement may be waived for a transfer up to a /22.
>
> Para ver o detalhe acesse:
> https://politicas.lacnic.net/politicas/detail/id/LAC-2020-1/language/pt
>
> As alterações da versão anterior podem ser vistas aqui:
> https://politicas.lacnic.net/politicas/diff2?id=LAC-2020-1&v=2&v2=1&language=PT
>
>   Os comentários e os pontos de vista aportados pela comunidade são
> vitais para o bom desenvolvimento do processo das propostas
> - Você está a favor ou em contra desta nova versão
>   da proposta?- Vê alguma desvantagem nesta nova versão
>   da proposta?
>
> - Que mudanças poderiam ser feitas à esta nova versão
>   da proposta para que seja mais eficaz?
>
> Por mais informações entre em contato conosco através do e-mail:
> info-politicas at lacnic.net.
>
> Atenciosamente,
> ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
> Dear LACNIC Policy List subscribers,
>
> Proposal LAC-2020-1 has been updated from version 1 to version 2
>
> Title: Add IPv6 operational as a requirement for IPv4 transfers
>
> Summary: On 15th February 2017 LACNIC started IPv4 Exhaustion Phase 3 meaning only new entrants can receive up to a single /22 of IPv4 space. Since then the amount of IPv4 Transfers between organizations has increased reasonably as shown by the official LACNIC reports. With the implementation of LAC-2019-1 and possibility of Inter-RIR transfers these numbers have the potential to grow substantially.
>
> The objective of this proposal is to add as a requirement for organizations in process of receiving transferred IPv4 space under 2.3.2.18 to show they have an IPv6 allocation/assignment by LACNIC or a provider and that is operational on their networks. Such organization must be able to prove this IPv6 space is being used by providing LACNIC the documented network deployment details to prove IPv6 is operational in significant parts of the network.
>
> On 28th November 2019 LACNIC Board issued a statement (https://www.lacnic.net/4283/2/lacnic/lacnic-board-calls-on-the-community-to-promote-ipv6-deployment) reinforcing the issue about IPv4 exhaustion, mentioning IPv4 address space will be exhausted by mid-2020 and calling the community to promote IPv6 deployment.
> In its statement LACNIC Board “invite the community to work on promoting the development of policies that will accelerate the effective deployment of IPv6 above other policies that may be discussed at a later date.”
>
> In the case the receiver provides a written statement from its upstream that IPv6 connectivity is unavailable, the IPv6 requirement may be waived. In the case LACNIC is not able to meet a new entrant request for IPv4 space the IPv6 requirement may be waived for a transfer up to a /22.
>
> To see the details, please click on:
> https://politicas.lacnic.net/politicas/detail/id/LAC-2020-1/language/en
>
> The changes from the previous version can be seen here:
> https://politicas.lacnic.net/politicas/diff2?id=LAC-2020-1&v=2&v2=1&language=EN
>
> The community's comments and opinions are essential to the proper functioning of the policy development process.
> - Do you support this new version of the proposal or are you against it?
> - Do you think this new version of the proposal has any drawbacks?
> - What changes could be made to this new version of the proposal to make it more effective?
>
> For further information, please contactinfo-politicas at lacnic.net
> Kind regards,
> --
> LACNIC - Registro de Direcciones de Internet para América Latina y Caribe
> Rambla Rep. de México 6125, CP 11400
>
> Montevideo-Uruguay
>
> Teléfono: +598 2604 22 22
> www.lacnic.net
> _______________________________________________
> Politicas mailing list
> Politicas at lacnic.net
> https://mail.lacnic.net/mailman/listinfo/politicas